Obama is now Goebbels!

Posted by: The BoBo  //  Category: A Nation at Risk, America, Civil Rights, Constitution, Fascism, Liberals, Media Bias, Obama, Politics, President, Republicans, Socialism, US Constitution, communism, government

Okay – seriously – for you guys on the left – isn’t this just more proof for you guys that Obama is a Fascist and is following in the footsteps of Hitler, Mussolini, and FDR?  Joseph Goebbels stated that when you control the media – you control the message.

Obama has now taken over ABC to push that idiotic healthcare reform plan.

ABC TURNS PROGRAMMING OVER TO OBAMA; NEWS TO BE ANCHORED FROM INSIDE WHITE HOUSE
Tue Jun 16 2009 08:45:10 ET

On the night of June 24, the media and government become one, when ABC turns its programming over to President Obama and White House officials to push government run health care -- a move that has ignited an ethical firestorm!

Highlights on the agenda:

ABCNEWS anchor Charlie Gibson will deliver WORLD NEWS from the Blue Room of the White House.

The network plans a primetime special -- 'Prescription for America' -- originating from the East Room, exclude opposing voices on the debate.

This absolutely is 100% proof that the media is so far in bed with government and government has taken control of the message. This shreds The First Amendment of the Freedom of the Press all to hell. But, with this administration…what else is new?  This is entirely one-sided since there will be no one there to present the other side of the debate.  No Republicans are allowed to be present or to speak on behalf of the opposition.  Again – Mr. Obama – where is this so-called “bipartisan debate” that you promised the country?

My country is going to hell in a handbasket and no one really seems to care about it.  How can we as Americans just stand by and allow the government to take over our national media like this?  This is one of the first steps that Hitler and Mussolini took when the state started taking over the lives of the people of those countries.  This also follows in the footsteps of Communist China, Russia, N. Korea, Iraq (Saddam Hussein), and Venezuela (Chavez).  Obama is controlling the message and the press is in the bag with him.  Seriously, what happened to the press being the watchdog over government as it was originally intended?

Is this what you guys on the left really voted for?  Really?  What makes you guys think you aren’t next?  If your agenda doesn’t fit with Obama’s statist positions – you can bet your voices will be stifled as well.

Sphere: Related Content

1 Total TweetBacks: (Tweet this post)
  • en: has put the menu for Lisa's Lunchbox online. Now go order something for delivery, or stop by! www.lisaslunchbox.com 07/14/09 11:05pm

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

14 Responses to “Obama is now Goebbels!”

  1. Brian AndersonNo Gravatar Says:

    Isn’t it ABC’s right, as a business, to do whatever it wants and sell space to whoever they want?

    Reply to Brian Anderson

  2. Bradley HankinsNo Gravatar Says:

    Your right Brian, but the media should be un-bias. They should be an independent organization that tells the country the news of the day. They should not be supportive of anything, but they should report both sides of the story, and leave the opinions up to the people. But the media these days have taken sides, and they have their own opinions, which is why you cannot just get your new from one service, as you will most likely only get one side of the story.

    Bradley Hankinss last blog post..Alabama Gubernatorial 2010: Early Predictions

    Reply to Bradley Hankins

  3. Comedy PlusNo Gravatar Says:

    Yep, this is about right and I’m not surprised one bit. If he can do what Chavez did he will. Ruler for life that is.

    Have a terrific day. :)

    Comedy Pluss last blog post..The Promise

    Reply to Comedy Plus

  4. John KadukNo Gravatar Says:

    @Brian

    True but at the moment I believe the government, aka the taxpayers are picking up the tab, not the DNC. This is being treated like a Presidential address, not the giant ad spot it really is. I believe that was one of the Republican’s major gripes.

    “The President has stated time and time again that he wants a bipartisan debate. Therefore, the Republican Party should be included in this primetime event, or the DNC should pay for your airtime. ”

    That quote is from the RNC which insinuates to me that I’m footing the bill yet Republicans aren’t allowed.

    John Kaduks last blog post..Obama Has His Own News Channel!

    Reply to John Kaduk

  5. The BoBoNo Gravatar Says:

    @Brian – just to add to what Bradley has already stated – the First Amendment guarantee of Freedom of the Press was to ensure that the media had uninhibited access to watch over the government and report back to the people in an unbiased manner. The founding fathers understood the power of the press even then. The very foundation of journalism is supposed to be non-biased, non-opinionated reporting. ABC is not a private company. ABC happens to be a publicly traded company and has to report to a board and to the shareholders. ABC News has the obligation to report fairly and balanced. Such a farce as what is to take place on June 24th is a direct affront against our constitution.

    @Bradley – spot on

    @John – Seems to me that the Republicans should be pointing out the obvious with regards to the biased reporting and how it spits in the face of our constitution rather than bitching about who’s dime it is. Sure, I don’t like the fact that we’re paying for it – but – there is a bigger issue here other than who’s footing the bill. This to me is more proof that the GOP is out of touch. They really need to be pushing the issue about non-representation with the media.

    @Sandee – pretty much sucks. I’m just waiting for Congress to sneak something in one of the bills that does away with Presidential term limits and elections.

    Reply to The BoBo

  6. Bradley HankinsNo Gravatar Says:

    @Bobo

    In reference to you reply to Sandee, if you go to my blog I am personally reading every bill that is introduced or voted on in Congress and putting my opinion and vote in. All starting with what was introduced and voted on since the 15th of course.

    Bradley Hankinss last blog post..H.R. 2422

    Reply to Bradley Hankins

  7. Cracked WorldNo Gravatar Says:

    This is nothing more than an Advertisement for the president. The white house should not be allowed to “Hire” a media source to do it’s bidding for it.

    How much of our tax dollars does this little stunt cost us?

    Money aside, this should be illegal not that it matters to this little Hitler.

    Another thought, how will the DNC react when the next Non-Democrat president tries this? They’ll scream bloody murder you know it. No one else should be allowed to get away with this only the Obamessiah.

    Cracked Worlds last blog post..“Socialized Medicine” A Government Health Care Plan

    Reply to Cracked World

  8. BobNo Gravatar Says:

    You accuse the Obama of controllong channel 7 news with no opposing point of view. But that is exactly what the Republicans have been doing with the Fox news network for years. Sorta like the pot calling the kettle black, don’t you think?

    Bobs last blog post..The Red Wings Lost

    Reply to Bob

  9. The BoBoNo Gravatar Says:

    @Bradley – that’s awesome. I’ll be sure to stop in frequently and source it.

    @Cracked – I have the same question.

    @Bob – Really? Bwahahaha. That is so laughable. I guess you never really watch Fox News then. You see, at least on the actual news programming they have it actually is very fair and balanced. If you’re referring to shows like Hannity, O’Reilly, and Beck – those are all opinion shows – they aren’t required to show any balance. ABC puts itself out there as part of the regular MSM – as such – they are obligated – just as is Fox News – to report on both sides of an issue without bias. If you want to see some real reporting – you should actually tune in to the news on Fox. In addition, even all the Fox opinion shows have people as guests from both sides of the aisle. You won’t see that anywhere on the regular MSM news broadcasts. You have become a slave to the Liberal media so much that you don’t even recognize fair and unbalanced journalism when it slaps you in the face.

    I think what actually amazes me the most is that you actually support this. Not once did Bush EVER have Fox news shut out the opposition opinion in anything. The Fox News arm never had exclusive access to Bush like the MSM have with Obama. Do you not believe in personal liberties and freedom as the constitution provides? You’ve got yourself in a rut believing it’s us versus them, Liberals versus Conservatives, Democrats versus Republicans. Do you not understand that is we the people versus our government right now? Obama is the biggest statist this country has ever had – and it’s people like you who are willing to give up your constitutional rights just because it’s Obama and he’s a Democrat. Seriously, Bob – I’m asking you to wake up and just look at this situation with an unbiased eye. Nothing like this has EVER happened in the media before despite what you “believe.” This is the reason why this is a newsmaker right now – it is unprecedented and goes against the very core of our constitution.

    And – as a last note – Go Penguins!!!! If you’ve been following this blog for a good period of time, you will know that I’m a huge Pittsburgh fan – all the way around. My family is from the Burg!

    Reply to The BoBo

  10. phuckpoliticsNo Gravatar Says:

    “The Fox News arm never had exclusive access to Bush like the MSM have with Obama.”

    I don’t know about that Bobo. These look like exclusive access to Bush, don’t you think?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5gNOete1mo

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,221975,00.html

    phuckpoliticss last blog post..Stories that interest me

    Reply to phuckpolitics

  11. The BoBoNo Gravatar Says:

    @Phuck – let me rephrase that – since I obviously lost the point on you guys. Those were all regular interviews – and – it wasn’t only Fox that did interviews with Bush (if you’d like I will post some links for you from NBC, CBS, and ABC where folks like Charlie Gibson and others interviewed him as well). Not once during the entire Bush administration did he use any one single media organization to the exclusion of all others where only “friends of the whitehouse” were invited to participate in an infomercial for a particular proposal. The Bush administration was always open to all the news organizations. However, since what Obama is doing is so unprecedented and the fact that only supporters of his healthcare proposals are invited to attend to the exclusion of the opposition – this is a very gross misuse and abuse of the press.

    Let’s not turn this in to “well, Bush did it.” What we are seeing now from Obama is something that no other president in history has ever done with regards to all of the idiotic policies coming out and the way he has grabbed executive power like no other. Obama is Bush on steroids. If those guys on the left was so against the so-called Bush power grab – why is no one on the left up in arms now? The problem, as I stated before, is that too many people are still in the us versus them mode that the government wants. In the meantime – the government is slowly eroding our rights and chipping away at the constitution. Considering the watchdog approach you generally take with politicians – I’m surprised that you yourself haven’t been posting about these things. I thought you were more moderate than that to be a partisan hack for Obama.

    Reply to The BoBo

  12. phuckpoliticsNo Gravatar Says:

    @Bobo – I’m not defending ABC news. Or any of the other news stations. I was just using those two examples to prove that Bush used Fox News to spread his message; just like Obama uses MSNBC to spread his.

    And I’m not defending Obama. In fact, I don’t like the guy. He’s just like Bush except he’s black and can speak in proper English.

    And I haven’t posted about this because I’m more interested in Senators owning stocks in bailed out banks, the 108 billion dollar war bill that just passed, the withholding of information from the Obama adminastraion, the lack of people in jail for torture, the backtracking on repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, the 60 million dollar extension of Bagram prison in Afghanistan, the 180,000-plus private contractors working in Iraq(financed by the taxpayers) and the failing War on Drugs.

    But I guess all of those things make me a partisan hack for Obama.

    phuckpoliticss last blog post..Stories that interest me

    Reply to phuckpolitics

  13. The BoBoNo Gravatar Says:

    @Phuck – okay – I’ll take back the political hack part. :) I can stand behind ya on the Senators who own stock in bailed out banks, (you might also want to check out Durbin who dumped tons of stock as the result of his personal meeting with Geithner, just a day before the bailouts were announced), the withholding of information, and the war on drug thing. However, I actually agree with everything else regarding the military that you oppose. Military defense funding is a necessity. Continued funding for our troops currently at war is necessary. Unless you’re ready to put all of the Dems, including Obama, Hillary & Bill Clinton, Erik Holder, and everyone else from the Clinton administration for “torture” it aint gonna happen. First – there was no torture. Second – the techniques used by the CIA under Bush were first designed and approved under the Clinton administration. This is a moot point as I’ve beaten this horse dead – waterboarding is not torture. Never has been, never will be. The Don’t Ask Don’t Tell should be rescinded back to before it was signed in to law by Clinton. The UCMJ states deviant behavior and homosexual relations are punishable by expulsion from the military. Unless that is what you are actually wanting – that is what repealing the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy actually means. It will not allow gays to openly serve in the military – which in my opinion – they should not be allowed.

    But – I digress from the original topic – this isn’t MSNBC – this is ABC – one of the Big 3 networks. Bush did not use any news outlet to push agenda this way. Perhaps, if you recall, any time Bush was interviewed, immediately following all of his interviews that may have contained policy issues – there was some “pundit” or politician who opposed it giving a counter-point view. This is not going to be the case with this ABC broadcast next week. No one will be allowed to give any opposing views – and – the Bush administration never gave direction to any of the news outlets like Obama has with ABC. Obama controls this broadcast – not ABC.

    Reply to The BoBo

  14. tracyNo Gravatar Says:

    Well i liked the comments more then the post ;)

    Reply to tracy

Talk to the BoBo!

CommentLuv Enabled
This site is using OpenAvatar based on
/* WARNING: This file is protected by copyright law. To reverse engineer or decode this file is strictly prohibited. */

The BoBo Files is using WP-Gravatar

  • Viagra online
  • Order cheap cialis
  • Buy viagra no prescription
  • Cialis online
  • Buy generic cialis
  • Order propecia no prescription
  • Cheap propecia online
  • Propecia online pharmacy
  • Order levitra online
  • Cheap price cialis
  • Online pharmacy levitra
  • Buy viagra online
  • Buy discount levitra
  • Cheap cialis online
  • Propecia hair loss
  • Switch to our mobile site